Aviation Safety Monitor Weekly Report for the Week Ending May 18, 2024

For New Readers: Please read our article “Did Safety Degrade in the National Airspace System in the Winter of 2022-2023?” that applies our methods and data to examine whether safety margins decreased during the events of winter 2022-2023.
The Aviation Safety Monitor measures safety margins by estimating the frequency, duration, and severity of buffer encroachments. Our paper “How Do We Measure Safety Margins?” provides a detailed description of the methods and data. That can be found here https://www.robust-analytics.com/measure on the Robust Analytics website.
Weekly Safety Margin Update. There was little change from the previous week, with safety margins slightly lower the past three weeks compared to April. Total encroachment durations for the week ending May 18 were 3.9 percent lower than the previous week, but encroachment events were 0.6 percent higher. Average weekly encroachment durations for the month of May are running 2.7 percent above the April average and event counts are 12.3 percent higher. Total encroachment events for the 26 airports are now at the highest level since the week of March 9. These changes can be easily seen in Figure 1 that displays weekly summary data for the 26 monitored airports. The Aviation Safety Monitor team will continue tracking the daily metrics this week to detect whether these past few weeks are a temporary increase or an indicator of a longer negative trend in safety

Figure 2 displays the typical time of day pattern that we observe in the data, as encroachment events are highly correlated with traffic density. Even after aggregating the data over 17 metroplexes operating in three time zones the time of day pattern remains prominent. Note that the daily peak increases from Monday to






Figure 7. Encroachment Duration Per Aircraft and Event Rates for 26 Airports
February 18, 2024 through May 18, 2024
How severe are these encroachments? The FAA defines three separation conformance categories based on how far they are from the separation index. (See the description “How Do We Measure Safety Margins?” for details on the conformance categories and how we measure them.) In that classification system, Conformance Categories A and B are the most severe. Under our definition of a buffer encroachment, Category A and B encroachments are counted under all meteorological conditions.
Figure 8 displays information on the most severe separation conformance categories. The daily durations and event counts for the sum of Category A and B encroachments are shown in Figure 7. The pattern differs from the Figure 1, as there is no obvious trend during the time period. This suggests that Category PE and C encroachments are affected by different factors from Category A and B. We will take a deep dive into those differences in a future weekly report.

The Aviation Safety Monitor summarizes output from Risk Tracker, the Robust Analytics in-time terminal airspace hazard and safety metrics monitoring system.

About the Aviation Safety Monitor
The Aviation Safety Monitor is a service provided by Robust Analytics to deliver timely information on terminal area safety in the National Airspace System (NAS). The safety monitoring and prediction technologies were developed by Robust Analytics over the past several years. Partial funding was provided by the NASA Small Business Innovation Research Program and the NASA System Wide Safety Project.
The Aviation Safety Monitor provides quantitative estimates of safety margins at 26 airports in 17 metropolitan regions in the United States. This information complements data on several safety-related events that are published elsewhere, with the FAA’s Runway Incursion Statistics website a good example. However, the available safety information can be misleading if it only reports the frequency of violations with no insight into how safety buffers may vary minute-to-minute and day-to-day. The Aviation Safety Monitor aims to provide this insight every week.